Prompt
Two-part – Consumer choices
Many people buy goods that they do not really need. Why do people do this, and what can be done to encourage more responsible spending?
Band 9 sample answer
Band 9 sample answer
Many consumers routinely purchase items that add little value to their lives. This pattern is driven by predictable psychological and social forces, and it can be curbed through a combination of regulation, education and small changes to how spending decisions are made.
A primary cause is emotional spending. Shopping can temporarily ease stress, boredom or insecurity, and the novelty of a new product provides a short-lived reward. Another powerful influence is social comparison. Advertising and social media create the impression that frequent upgrading—of phones, clothes or home décor—is normal, so people buy to signal status or to avoid feeling left behind. In addition, cashless payments and “buy now, pay later” credit reduce the pain of paying, separating the pleasure of consumption from the immediate cost and making discretionary purchases feel harmless.
More responsible spending is achievable if incentives and information improve. Governments can tighten rules on consumer credit and require clearer disclosure of the true cost of instalments, fees and interest, while also limiting manipulative “dark patterns” such as misleading countdown timers. Schools should teach practical financial literacy: budgeting, recognising marketing tactics, and distinguishing needs from wants. Employers and banks can support this with default tools such as spending alerts and automatic transfers into savings. On a personal level, simple “friction” strategies are effective, including a 24-hour waiting rule, shopping lists, and deleting stored card details to reduce impulsive checkouts.
Overall, unnecessary buying stems from emotional impulses, social pressure and low-friction credit. Coordinated action—smarter regulation, better education and practical decision aids—can help consumers spend more deliberately and sustainably.
Verified word count: 261
Why this answer works
explanation
It answers both parts directly: it explains clear, distinct drivers of unnecessary purchasing (emotions, social comparison, and low-friction credit) and then provides specific, realistic measures by governments, schools, employers/banks, and individuals. The structure is logical (causes then solutions), each paragraph has a clear focus, and examples (BNPL, countdown timers, stored card details) are prompt-relevant and concrete.
what this question tests
This is a two-part (cause + solution) Task 2 question. It tests your ability to explain why unnecessary consumption happens (psychological, social and economic drivers) and then propose practical, realistic measures. To score highly, you must address both questions clearly and with roughly equal development, organise ideas logically, and use precise academic language.
Useful vocabulary and phrases
emotional spending
Names a key cause precisely and academically.
Emotional spending may provide short-term comfort but often causes longer-term regret.
social comparison
Explains modern consumer pressure clearly.
Social comparison on social media can make constant upgrading seem necessary.
the pain of paying
Shows sophisticated behavioural-economics framing.
Cashless payments reduce the pain of paying, which can increase impulse purchases.
buy now, pay later (BNPL)
Highly relevant contemporary example.
BNPL options can encourage people to buy items they would avoid if paying upfront.
financial literacy
Directly links to an actionable solution area.
Teaching financial literacy can help teenagers distinguish needs from wants.
dark patterns
Targets a specific mechanism behind unnecessary buying.
Regulators could restrict dark patterns such as forced urgency and confusing opt-outs.
create friction
Turns advice into a practical behavioural strategy.
A 24-hour waiting rule creates friction before buying non-essentials.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Explaining causes without giving equally developed solutions (or vice versa).
- Giving vague solutions (e.g., “people should spend wisely”) without clear mechanisms or examples.
- Overgeneralising or moralising instead of analysing drivers like advertising, credit and social media.
- Using informal language or sarcasm that undermines an academic tone.
- Listing solutions without grouping them logically (policy, education, individual habits).
Want examiner-style feedback on your answer?
Submit your essay and unlock a band estimate, corrections, and improvement steps.
Get examiner-style feedback