Prompt
Technology and quality of life
Some people believe that technological advances have improved quality of life for most people. Others argue that such progress has caused more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Band 9 sample answer
Band 9 sample answer
Technological progress is often credited with making life easier and healthier, yet it is also blamed for creating new social and personal harms. While I accept that innovation has introduced serious challenges, I believe the overall impact on most people’s quality of life has been strongly positive, provided it is managed responsibly.
On the one hand, modern technology has delivered clear gains in living standards. Advances in medicine, from improved diagnostic imaging to vaccine development and telehealth, have reduced mortality and expanded access to care, particularly for people in remote areas. In everyday life, labour-saving devices and digital services save time and broaden opportunities: online banking, navigation apps and remote work platforms allow people to complete tasks efficiently and participate in education or employment that was previously inaccessible.
On the other hand, critics argue that the same tools can diminish wellbeing. Smartphones and social media, for example, can encourage addiction-like behaviour, anxiety and constant comparison, especially among teenagers. Automation and AI also disrupt labour markets, leaving some workers unemployed or forced into insecure “gig” work. In addition, heavy reliance on digital systems raises concerns about privacy, cybercrime and the spread of misinformation.
In my view, these drawbacks are substantial but not decisive. Many problems stem from weak regulation and poor digital literacy rather than technology itself. Stronger data-protection laws, transparent platform standards, and retraining programmes for displaced workers can mitigate harms while preserving the immense benefits of innovation.
Overall, although technological advances have created genuine risks, they have improved health, convenience and opportunity for the majority, and their net contribution to quality of life remains positive.
Verified word count: 269
Why this answer works
explanation
It addresses both perspectives with balanced development, then states a clear opinion and defends it with concrete examples (healthcare, accessibility, social media harms, labour disruption). The argument is logically sequenced (intro → benefits → drawbacks → opinion/solutions → conclusion), uses precise topic vocabulary, and includes a nuanced stance by proposing mitigation rather than a simplistic yes/no judgement.
what this question tests
This discussion-and-opinion task tests your ability to (1) present both sides fairly, (2) take a clear, consistent position, and (3) support claims with specific, realistic examples while maintaining strong coherence, varied vocabulary, and accurate complex grammar.
Useful vocabulary and phrases
quality of life
Directly matches the prompt and frames the essay topic.
Technological advances have improved quality of life for many households.
labour-saving devices
Specific collocation that strengthens examples.
Labour-saving devices free up time for leisure or family life.
expanded access to care
Academic phrasing suitable for Task 2.
Telemedicine has expanded access to care in rural communities.
automation disrupts labour markets
Shows ability to express complex socio-economic effects.
Automation disrupts labour markets by reducing demand for routine roles.
data-protection laws
Adds solutions and demonstrates nuance.
Stronger data-protection laws can reduce privacy violations.
digital literacy
Supports the ‘managed responsibly’ stance with a practical lever.
Improving digital literacy helps users spot misinformation online.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Discussing only benefits or only problems and forgetting to ‘discuss both views’.
- Giving an opinion but not supporting it with specific examples.
- Overgeneralising (e.g., ‘technology is always bad’) instead of presenting a nuanced argument.
- Listing points without clear linking and paragraph structure.
- Using informal language (e.g., ‘tech is cool’) instead of academic phrasing.
Want examiner-style feedback on your answer?
Submit your essay and unlock a band estimate, corrections, and improvement steps.
Get examiner-style feedback