Prompt
Problem + solution – Housing affordability
In many cities, housing has become increasingly unaffordable. What are the main reasons for this, and what measures could be taken to address the problem?
Band 9 sample answer
Band 9 sample answer
Housing costs have outpaced incomes in many major cities, turning home ownership—and even renting—into an unrealistic goal for ordinary workers. This trend is driven by a mix of demand pressures and supply constraints, and it requires coordinated action rather than a single quick fix.
One major cause is the growing gap between housing supply and population growth. Cities attract migrants and young professionals for jobs and amenities, yet construction often lags due to restrictive zoning, lengthy approval processes, and limited land released for development. At the same time, housing has increasingly been treated as an investment asset. Low interest rates in recent years, along with speculative buying and purchases by wealthy domestic and overseas investors, have pushed prices up, especially in desirable central districts.
To address the problem, governments should first expand supply by reforming planning rules. Allowing higher-density building near transport hubs, speeding up permits, and incentivising the conversion of underused commercial space into apartments can add homes quickly. Second, demand-side policies should curb speculation: for example, higher taxes on vacant properties, tighter regulation of short-term rentals, and stamp-duty surcharges for multiple-home owners can discourage hoarding. Finally, cities need a larger stock of non-market housing. Partnerships with private developers that require a fixed proportion of affordable units, alongside well-funded social housing programmes, would protect lower- and middle-income residents from being priced out.
In sum, unaffordability stems mainly from constrained supply and investment-driven demand; easing planning bottlenecks, discouraging speculative ownership, and expanding affordable housing are the most effective remedies.
Verified word count: 258
Why this answer works
explanation
The essay answers both parts of the prompt by identifying two primary causes (structural undersupply and investment/speculation) and proposing three linked measures (planning reform to boost supply, targeted taxes/regulation to reduce speculative demand, and expansion of non-market/affordable housing). It maintains a clear, consistent stance that the issue is multifactorial and needs coordinated policy responses. Ideas are logically sequenced with clear topic sentences and an Overview-style opening that frames the whole response.
what this question tests
This problem–solution Task 2 prompt tests your ability to (1) identify and prioritise key drivers of housing unaffordability, (2) propose realistic, policy-level and practical measures to address those drivers, and (3) organise ideas logically with a clear position, strong cohesion, and precise vocabulary for urban policy and economics.
Useful vocabulary and phrases
housing costs have outpaced incomes
Shows clear economic relationship in concise academic wording.
In many capitals, housing costs have outpaced incomes for over a decade.
supply constraints
Accurate, high-level term frequently used in policy discussion.
Supply constraints such as zoning rules can keep prices high.
restrictive zoning
Specific cause, avoids vague language like “rules”.
Restrictive zoning often prevents higher-density developments.
lengthy approval processes
Adds realism and detail to the supply argument.
Lengthy approval processes delay projects and raise costs.
treated as an investment asset
Explains speculative demand clearly.
When housing is treated as an investment asset, prices can detach from local wages.
curb speculation
Strong verb-noun collocation for solutions.
Tax changes can curb speculation in overheated markets.
vacant property tax
Concrete policy example; demonstrates specificity.
A vacant property tax can discourage leaving apartments unused.
non-market housing
Higher-register term; shows range and policy awareness.
Non-market housing provides a buffer against rent spikes.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Listing many minor causes without prioritising the main drivers.
- Giving solutions that do not match the causes (e.g., only building more luxury housing).
- Writing vague measures ("the government should do something") without mechanisms (taxes, zoning reform, quotas).
- Overgeneralising about foreign buyers without acknowledging broader demand and supply factors.
- Failing to conclude with a clear summary of both causes and solutions.
Want examiner-style feedback on your answer?
Submit your essay and unlock a band estimate, corrections, and improvement steps.
Get examiner-style feedback