Prompt
Discuss both views – University education
Some people think university education should be free for everyone, while others believe students should pay tuition fees. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Band 9 sample answer
Band 9 sample answer
Whether university should be free is widely debated. Some argue that higher education is a public good and ought to be funded by the state, whereas others contend that students should contribute through tuition fees. This essay discusses both perspectives and argues for a mixed model with targeted support.
Those in favour of free university emphasise equality of opportunity. If fees are removed, capable students from low-income families are less likely to be deterred by debt, which can broaden participation and improve social mobility. In addition, societies benefit when more people gain advanced skills: doctors, engineers and teachers raise productivity and strengthen public services. From this angle, taxpayer funding is justified because graduates’ expertise ultimately serves the whole community.
However, charging tuition is often seen as fair and financially realistic. Universities are expensive to run, and relying solely on public budgets can lead to overcrowding, outdated facilities and underpaid staff. Fees can provide institutions with stable income and create competition that encourages better teaching and research. Moreover, individuals typically enjoy substantial private returns from degrees through higher lifetime earnings, so it seems reasonable that they share the cost rather than placing the entire burden on taxpayers, including those who never attend university.
In my view, neither extreme is ideal. Governments should guarantee access by subsidising tuition heavily, offering means-tested grants and income-contingent loans, while still requiring many students to pay a portion when they can afford it. This approach protects disadvantaged learners without undermining university quality or diverting excessive public funds from schools, healthcare and other priorities.
Verified word count: 260
Why this answer works
explanation
It addresses both sides with clearly separated paragraphs, then gives a precise opinion and a workable policy compromise. Ideas are developed with causal reasoning (access, social mobility, public benefit; funding stability, quality, private returns) and supported by realistic examples. Cohesion is achieved through clear signposting and logical progression, while vocabulary and grammar are varied and accurate.
what this question tests
This is a “discuss both views + opinion” Task 2 prompt. It tests your ability to: (1) present balanced arguments for two opposing positions; (2) state a clear personal view; (3) develop reasons with specific examples; and (4) maintain coherent paragraphing and an academic tone.
Useful vocabulary and phrases
equality of opportunity
Common academic collocation for education and social policy topics.
Removing fees can promote equality of opportunity for disadvantaged students.
deterred by debt
Natural phrasing that clearly explains a key mechanism.
Many applicants are deterred by debt even if they are academically capable.
public good
Helps justify government funding with formal economic language.
Higher education can be viewed as a public good that merits state support.
private returns
Adds analytical depth and balances the argument.
Graduates often receive large private returns in the form of higher salaries.
means-tested grants
Specific policy vocabulary signals precision and sophistication.
Means-tested grants can ensure low-income students are not excluded.
income-contingent loans
Shows nuanced understanding and avoids simplistic solutions.
Income-contingent loans reduce risk for graduates who earn less than expected.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Discussing only one view or forgetting to state your opinion clearly.
- Giving an opinion in the introduction but contradicting it later.
- Using vague examples (e.g., “many people”) without explaining mechanisms like access, quality or funding.
- Overgeneralising that “free education is always better” without addressing costs and trade-offs.
- Writing a conclusion that merely repeats earlier sentences instead of finalising your position.
Want examiner-style feedback on your answer?
Submit your essay and unlock a band estimate, corrections, and improvement steps.
Get examiner-style feedback