Prompt
Advantages outweigh – International tourism
International tourism has grown significantly in recent decades. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Band 9 sample answer
Band 9 sample answer
International tourism has expanded rapidly in recent decades, fuelled by budget airlines, relaxed visa rules and a global middle class with more disposable income. While this trend can damage ecosystems and disrupt local life, I believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages overall, especially when destinations manage visitor numbers and reinvest revenue.
The most compelling benefit is economic and developmental. Tourism creates jobs across a wide spectrum, including accommodation, transport, food services and guiding, and it also stimulates indirect employment in construction, agriculture and logistics. For many low- and middle-income countries, visitor spending provides a vital source of foreign currency and taxation that is less volatile than reliance on a single export. When governments channel these receipts into airports, public transport, sanitation and healthcare, the gains extend well beyond tourist zones and raise living standards for residents.
Tourism can also encourage preservation and mutual understanding. Heritage sites, museums and protected landscapes are more likely to be maintained when entrance fees and tour permits generate predictable funding. Moreover, meaningful cultural exchange—through homestays, local festivals or community-led tours—can reduce stereotypes and promote pride in local traditions.
Admittedly, the drawbacks are serious. Overcrowding can inflate rents, replace neighbourhood shops with souvenir outlets and cause resentment among locals. Environmentally, mass tourism produces waste, strains water supplies and increases emissions from long-haul flights. However, these harms are not inevitable. Measures such as visitor caps, zoning rules for short-term rentals, eco-taxes earmarked for conservation, and stricter standards for cruise ships and hotels can significantly reduce the footprint.
In conclusion, international tourism brings real social and environmental risks, but its capacity to generate employment, fund infrastructure and support conservation means its advantages are greater, provided growth is regulated responsibly.
Verified word count: 286
Why this answer works
explanation
The essay states a clear position and consistently weighs benefits against drawbacks. It develops advantages (employment, foreign currency, public investment, preservation, cultural exchange) and disadvantages (housing pressure, commodification, pollution, emissions), then explains how realistic policy tools can mitigate harms—supporting the claim that benefits outweigh costs. The structure is logical with clear topic sentences and a decisive conclusion.
what this question tests
This Task 2 question tests your ability to (1) take a clear position on whether benefits outweigh drawbacks, (2) develop balanced arguments with relevant examples, (3) organise ideas coherently (introduction–body–conclusion), and (4) use precise vocabulary to discuss economic, cultural, and environmental impacts.
Useful vocabulary and phrases
a vital source of foreign currency
Expresses a clear macroeconomic advantage in natural academic language.
For island economies, tourism is a vital source of foreign currency.
inflate rents
Accurately captures a common social downside of tourism.
Short-term rentals can inflate rents in central districts.
eco-taxes earmarked for conservation
Adds credible, policy-focused detail that supports a balanced evaluation.
Eco-taxes earmarked for conservation can pay for habitat restoration and park staff.
meaningful cultural exchange
Shows nuance beyond simple ‘tourism is good/bad for culture’ claims.
Meaningful cultural exchange is more likely in community-led tours than in mass package trips.
visitor caps
A realistic management tool that strengthens the ‘outweigh’ argument.
Visitor caps can protect fragile sites during peak season.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Discussing pros and cons without making a clear ‘outweigh’ judgement.
- Relying on vague claims like ‘tourism is good for the economy’ without explaining mechanisms (jobs, tax, foreign currency, multiplier effects).
- Ignoring who bears the costs (residents facing rent rises, workers in precarious jobs, fragile ecosystems).
- Listing environmental problems without mentioning feasible mitigation (caps, eco-taxes, standards).
- Writing a conclusion that merely repeats points rather than delivering a weighed, conditional judgement.
Want examiner-style feedback on your answer?
Submit your essay and unlock a band estimate, corrections, and improvement steps.
Get examiner-style feedback